Methodology: How We Calculate Dental Costs
We publish where each number comes from, and we say plainly when we do not have data. Every state-level figure on this site is an observed price from a named source — never an estimate derived from another procedure.
Correction — July 13, 2026
An internal audit found that our per-state figures for braces and veneers were not observed prices: they were derived from our implant series by a fixed multiplier, which made every procedure share the same state ranking. Real data shows that is wrong — orthodontic prices are uncorrelated with restorative prices (Spearman 0.04). We have removed the derived columns, rebuilt every affected page on observed data, and issued a corrected version of the published dataset. Details and the full analysis are in our corrections log. The step-by-step research, review and publication workflow is described on our editorial process page.
1. Data Sources, Per Series
Each price series has one named source. We do not blend sources inside a series, and we do not extrapolate one procedure's prices from another's.
- Single dental implant (complete) — our own series. Observed cash prices across the 50 states and DC, published as the US Dental Cost Index (CC BY 4.0). Independently validated against the ASQ360°/CareCredit implant series: Spearman rank correlation 0.945.
- Braces, veneers, crowns, dentures — ASQ360° / CareCredit. State-level averages from the Average Procedural Cost Study conducted by ASQ360° Market Research for Synchrony's CareCredit (2023–2024 cost tables). Cited and linked wherever displayed; not redistributed as part of our open dataset.
- Procedures with no per-state source (whitening, fillings, extractions, root canals): we publish national ranges only, or clearly-labelled estimates scaled by the restorative index. We do not invent state-level precision we do not have.
- National spending and out-of-pocket burden — AHRQ MEPS (validation layer, added September 2026). Survey-weighted national estimates computed by our team from the AHRQ MEPS 2024 Full Year Consolidated File (HC-256, released August 28, 2026) and HC-251 (2023): in 2024, 46.6% of Americans had a dental visit, total dental spending was $166.9B (+10.3% vs 2023) and 46.3% of it was paid out of pocket. MEPS measures person-level spending, not per-procedure prices — we use it to cross-check the plausibility of our claims-based and survey-based series, never to set a price. Published at /api/v1/meps/national.json.
The American Dental Association discontinued its Survey of Dental Fees after 2023, so no current ADA fee survey underpins any figure here. We previously listed the ADA, FAIR Health and CMS as sources; that was inaccurate and has been removed.
2. Price Type and Confidence Score (added August 2026)
Every price we publish now carries a price type and a confidence score, shown as a badge next to the figure and as a provenance block in the open API. The price type says how the number was obtained; the score says how much weight it deserves. Neither changes the underlying figure.
- observed_market — a measured state average from a published cash-price survey (ASQ360°/CareCredit 2023–2024) or from our own observed implant series.
- observed_quotes — prices read from real, itemised treatment plans (Real Quotes Index; not yet used in published figures).
- estimated_index — no per-state source: the national range scaled by the state's Restorative Cost Index. Modelled.
- national_band — cosmetic procedure with no per-state source: every state carries the national range. Modelled.
- medicaid_paid — what Medicaid actually paid per claim line, from the HHS T-MSIS Medicaid Provider Spending by HCPCS dataset (2018–2024), provider state assigned through the NPPES registry. A paid amount, not an allowed amount and not a consumer price.
- official_fee (published fee schedules), chain_list_price (a chain's published "starting at" price) and commercial_allowed (All-Payer Claims Databases, licensed, not yet published).
- S — source tier: real quotes, Medicaid paid or commercial allowed with ≥ 100 observations = 1.0; official fee 0.9; measured market survey 0.8; chain list price 0.7; estimate from index 0.45; national band 0.3.
- G — granularity: ZIP 1.0; ZIP-3 / metro 0.85; state 0.6; national 0.3.
- F — freshness of the last observed month: ≤ 12 months 1.0; ≤ 24 months 0.8; ≤ 36 months 0.6; older 0.4.
- D — sample and dispersion: min(1, log10(n)/3) × (1 − min(0.5, (high − low) / (2 × avg))); 0.4 when the sample size is not disclosed.
Worked examples with today's data: a dental crown (measured state average, 51 markets, 2023–2024) scores about 65; a single implant (our own 2025–2026 series) about 72; fillings or extractions (estimated from the index) are capped at 60; teeth whitening (national band) sits in the 40s; Medicaid paid amounts for a crown (660,000 claim lines, 2023–2024) score in the 70s–80s at state level. The formula is deliberately simple and will be recalibrated once the Real Quotes Index passes 100 complete quotes. The list of every source we use or have evaluated, with its licence and republication rights, is published as a machine-readable sources registry.
3. Three Price Regimes — And Why One Index Cannot Rank Them All
Comparing five independently-sourced state series, we found that dental prices do not share a single geography. There are at least three regimes, and they barely correlate:
- Restorative (implants, crowns, dentures): tightly coupled, Spearman 0.93–0.96. A state that is cheap for one is genuinely cheap for the others. This is what our Restorative Cost Index measures.
- Orthodontic (braces): independent of everything else (Spearman 0.04). A specialist market with its own economics.
- Cosmetic (veneers): nearly independent too (Spearman ~0.18; correlation with cost of living just r = 0.07). Elective work priced on local demand, not on the practice's cost base.
This is why our index is called a Restorative Cost Index and is never used to rank braces or veneers. It is also why "cheapest states for dental work" lists — including our own, previously — are misleading when applied to cosmetic or orthodontic care.
4. The "Affordability Score"
We assign each state a score out of 100 to help you gauge value on restorative care.
A score > 100 means the state offers better value than the national average. A score < 100 indicates higher costs or lower insurance coverage. It does not apply to orthodontic or cosmetic treatment.
5. Editorial Policy
Independence: Our content is produced independently and is not influenced by advertisers or sponsors. Dental clinics cannot pay to alter their pricing in our database or receive favorable treatment in our reviews.
Data Review: Our pricing data is compiled and cross-checked by our in-house Data & Research Team against the public sources listed above. Real Dental Costs publishes pricing and market research, not clinical advice — always consult a licensed dentist for diagnosis and treatment decisions.
Corrections: We are committed to correcting errors promptly. If you find an inaccuracy, please contact us.
Citing this research: Every dataset behind our pricing pages is openly licensed (CC BY 4.0) with a permanent DOI. For ready-to-copy APA and BibTeX citations, see our cite this data page. The full annual analysis built on these datasets is published as the State of U.S. Dental Costs 2026 report.